Domain Name Disputes in India

Dec 2022

Domain Name As Trademarks

A domain name which is unique, capable of identifying itself and distinguishing its goods and services from those of others and acts as a reliable source identifier of concerned goods and services on the internet may be registered as a trademark.

Domain Name Disputes

A domain name dispute would arise when a domain name comparable to a registered trademark is registered by an individual or association who is not the trademark holder. All domain name registrars must follow the ICANN’s Uniform Domain-Name Dispute-Resolution Policy (UDRP).

Protection Of Domain Name In India

In India, domain names may be granted protection as a trademark under the provisions of Trademarks Act, 1999, provided that the domain name fulfils all requirements to be properly registered under the Act.

An appellant in a proceeding must establish the following three elements to succeed:

The domain name is indistinguishable or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the appellant has rights;
The registrant does not have rights or legitimate interests in the domain name;
The domain name has been registered and is being used in “bad faith”.

Legal Remedies

Once registered, the registered proprietor of a domain name will have all those legitimate rights and authorities which are commonly availed by the owners of registered trademarks or services marks in India. This also includes the right to sue for infringement or passing off. If the challenge were successful, the domain name will be suspended or all the rights over it would be transferred to the legitimate owner. The owner of the trademark can file a suit at the civil court in order to obtain injunction or compensation.

In Bigtree Entertainment v Brain Seed Sportainment 2018, the Delhi high court recently denied the plaintiffs, and owners of the website bookmyshow.com, an interim injunction against the defendant’s use of the domain name bookmysports.com. The court considering that prefix BOOKMY of the Plaintiff’s trademark BOOKMYSHOW was descriptive, not an arbitrary coupling of words and the plaintiff’s failure to prove that “BOOKMY” has acquired distinctiveness or secondary meaning, dismissed the application for interim injunction filed by the plaintiffs.
In Titan Indistries Limited V. Prashanth Koorapati And Ors.(1998), the defendant had registered ‘tanishq.com’ as its domain name which was based on the plaintiffs trademarks TANISHQ. The plaintiff objected the use of its Trade Marks as domain name by the defendant. The court issued an ex parte ad-interim injunction restraining defendant from registering a name or operating any business or including the word TANISHQ as a domain name on the internet; that could lead to passing off the business and goods of defendant as those of plaintiff.

Trending Blogs

India dropped to 40th position in International Intellectual Property Index

India has fallen to 40th position in the International Intellectual Property Index. This index helps know about the IP climate in the 53 global economies of the present year. This is as per the report US Chamber of Commerce’s Global Innovation Policy Center. As per last year’s report, India has been ranked in the 36th […]

These days, there is an increased use of smartphones, computers and tablets and multimedia has shown its great influence in our lives. In the digital world, there are several works used by us. Have you thought whose work are we using? Well, none of us have tried to find out the owner of the work […]

Why Is Protection of Geographical Indication or Designation of Origin Essential?

Having knowing regarding geographical indication along with designation of origin is something that is of great need these days. Geographical indication or GI indicates a symbol, name or sign relating to a product that corresponds to a definite geographical origin, product’s features, qualities that are due from the origin. To make a sign work as […]

Well Known Trademark And Indian Law

What is well-known trademark? As per new Trade Mark Rules 2017, a new procedure has been created that allows the Registrar to proclaim a particular trademark as “well known”. Section 2(1)(zg) Of The Trademark Act, 1999 states that well- known trademark is a mark which has become well known to the section of the public […]

Drug Patents and Generic Pharmaceutical Drugs

When a drug is manufactured and released to the market in the initial period, it is sold under a certain brand names and can only be availed from a pharmacy after being prescribed by the doctor. The patent of the drug is owned by a few brands who are the only eligible brands to manufacture […]

US and India to join hands on the grounds of Intellectual Property Rights

After US President Donald Trump’s visit in India from February 24 to 25th February, India and the US have opted for an agreement relating to intellectual property rights or IPR. As a result of this, the cabinet sanctioned MoU with the US pertaining to IPRs, relevant to information and broadcasting as has been stated by […]

Copyrights of Music in India

Music is an art more specifically an intangible form of art. Copyrighting a song or a melody protects the basic right of the creator. The copyright also assist the creator financially. In order to ask for copyright the creator needs to file a registration. Once the creator gains the copyright, any infringement to the copyrighted […]

Intellectual Property and its Role in the Pharmaceutical Industry

Intellectual property rights are considered to be an important asset of any corporate unit. It is an indication of the creation of mind and the work that makes one entity different from the other. With better IP or intellectual rights, it would be easy to promote the possible innovations and this would be useful in […]

Liability Of Internet Service Providers In Digital Environment

Isp Liability In India: Internet Service Providers (ISPs) can be liable for the content on the sites they host. They can be liable even if they were merely passively hosting the site, unless they take down the objectionable material when they receive notice of it. The Copyright Act and the Information Technology Act includes the […]

Breaking News: Toyota Loses Trademark Battle over Prius at Indian Supreme Court

The plaintiff, in this case, is Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha and they seek to prevent the defendant, a spare parts supplier by the name M/S Prius Auto Industries Limited, from the usage of the trademarks- “Toyota”, “Innova”, and “Prius”. According to the finding of the court, two of the three trademarks mentioned, namely Toyota and […]