Celebrity Rights – Public, Private or Intellectual Property

Dec 2022

Celebrity lives are mostly public these days through different sources but they too want to maintain certain privacy. This has triggered the need to maintain celebrity rights on different properties. There are several company options that are selling products with celebrity faces from bags to soaps to cosmetics to many others. It requires suitable celebrity rights for the private or intellectual property. Also, gift hampers are available stating a chance to meet the celebrity if they win the lottery or equivalent games.

Before the companies start promoting such deals and products with celebrity faces, they should get suitable consent from the celebrity. Moreover, when arranging for such events, the celebrity should have proper knowledge about it. If such incidents are organized without the consent of the celebrity, it can result in infringement of celebrity rights. This triggers the need of registration of celebrity rights that includes private and public rights.

Let us take a look at the details of the rights in the following pat of the article.

  • Publicity rights

    It is about using the fame of a celebrity which is also called publicity right. The fame is used to augment to sales of product or service relating to the brand. Here, the business owner should take permission from the celebrity to use their frame. When done without consent of the person, it may result in infringement issues.

  • Privacy rights

    Celebrities try to maintain private life and keep it personal. As per constitution article 21, one knows about the details of rights to privacy which is part of fundamental rights. However, celebrities may take legal steps on grounds of invasion of privacy by others without the person’s consent or permission.

  • Personal rights

    So, these three types of rights are part of celebrity rights that should be taken into consideration if you wish to use any element that relates to any celebrity. Without their consent, it will not be suitable and it can result in legal issues.

    The right to publicity has long come into being where it has been stated that it requires the consent of celerity to use their fame. Irrespective of it is for non-advertising or advertising purpose, it requires the permission of celebrity. These rules are applicable as mentioned by courts since the start of the rights.

    However, lawsuits are available for such defamation and media may lose action for privacy invasion problems. The court will talk in favor of the celebrity in case their fame has been invaded without their permission. It belongs to intellectual property of the celebrity and therefore, it is important to get permission of the person before using their face or fame on public items.

Wrapping it up

The celebrity’s intellectual property rights are highly debated these days and any kind of invasion involves legal steps to be taken by the concerned celebrity. The celebrity has a legal right in their life to control and earn profit from it. They can control which company or brands are permissible to use their face or fame for the company promotion.

Trending Blogs
Early-Stage Intellectual Property to Raise More Money
What is Artificial Intelligence? Creation of innovative ideas is what matters the most in running a business. People were least bothered to patent the designs. But with increasing use of almost similar ideas in the businesses, it is of great importance to patent the ideas. This shall help in better growth of the business and […]
Read More
Lack of Music Publishing Knowledge Robbing Indian Artists of their Rights
In India there has been a lack of knowledge regarding publishing music. It can be said that a large part of publishing an art for is still unexplored. It is not about the common people but the artists and the music companies are oblivious towards it. At the initial stage due to lack of knowledge […]
Read More
Well Known Trademark And Indian Law
What is well-known trademark? As per new Trade Mark Rules 2017, a new procedure has been created that allows the Registrar to proclaim a particular trademark as “well known”. Section 2(1)(zg) Of The Trademark Act, 1999 states that well- known trademark is a mark which has become well known to the section of the public […]
Read More
Evaluation Intellectual Property Rights
Intellectual property has always existed since the dawn of time but there were no laws in place for their protection. Intellectual property is intangible asset, be it music, creative writing, arts, discoveries, inventions and development of unique words, symbols and artwork. Intellectual property rights is a generic term that covers copyright, industrial design, trade secrets, […]
Read More
Pharma Companies File 15% of Patents in India
The Indian Pharma industry is primarily known for its Generic Drugs. But recently, to push its value higher in the market, the Indian pharmaceutical industry is investing more in research and development of new drugs along with increasing the potency of the existing ones to move up the value chain. From 2013-2015, out of the […]
Read More
Liability Of Internet Service Providers In Digital Environment
Isp Liability In India: Internet Service Providers (ISPs) can be liable for the content on the sites they host. They can be liable even if they were merely passively hosting the site, unless they take down the objectionable material when they receive notice of it. The Copyright Act and the Information Technology Act includes the […]
Read More
US and India to join hands on the grounds of Intellectual Property Rights
After US President Donald Trump’s visit in India from February 24 to 25th February, India and the US have opted for an agreement relating to intellectual property rights or IPR. As a result of this, the cabinet sanctioned MoU with the US pertaining to IPRs, relevant to information and broadcasting as has been stated by […]
Read More
PTAB Should Not Disapprove Claims on the Grounds of Indefiniteness in IPR
Federal Circuit has disapproved of arguments of claims that show any reason other than anticipation pertaining to party procedures. Federal Circuit has rejected the challenge shown by Samsung Electronics America, Inc. The company challenged that PTAB can disapprove claims that are considered indefinite in IPR. Samsung has been charged on the grounds of infringing U.S. […]
Read More
Delhi HC’s Ex Parte Order in Coca-Cola Company & Anr vs Glacier Water Industries Ltd.
This is a case of a Delhi High court ex parte proceeding concerning trademark dilution. The plaintiff filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction, damages and to restrain them from passing off their products as that of the plaintiff. The plaintiff also pleaded the court to restrain the defendants from using the mark ‘KINLEY’ and […]
Read More
Domain Name Disputes in India
Domain Name As Trademarks A domain name which is unique, capable of identifying itself and distinguishing its goods and services from those of others and acts as a reliable source identifier of concerned goods and services on the internet may be registered as a trademark. Domain Name Disputes A domain name dispute would arise when […]
Read More
X
Download Firm Profile